Between Apathyand Insanity
About this Entry
Posted by: bucketandshovel

Visit bucketandshovel's Xanga Site

Original: 7/24/2006 3:06 PM
Views: 43
Comments: 10
eProps: 12

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site



Monday, July 24, 2006

What is wrong with the sermons of Southern Baptist preachers

 
Currently Reading
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry into Values
By Robert Pirsig
see related
My wife and I went to McAlester OK for the weekend for my mom's 50th b-day party, and then on Sunday, we attended the church where I was a member for about 17 years.  Anyways, the preacher preached a sermon and it was just like every sermon I'd heard before.  Not bad, just familiar.  And as i was listenning to it, I realized that there are (at least) two things wrong with every sermon I'd heard in that church as well as many other Southern Baptist Churches in Oklahoma and Texas:

1.  The sermons are not people-centered.

The sermon consisted of a chapter in Ephesians in which the preacher went verse by verse, stopping after each verse to explain what each verse "said," and then moved on to the next verse, etc.  Really, he ended up preaching about 9 little sermon vignettes that I don't really remember at all.  Why do I not remember anything?  Because the theme of each of these little vignettes had no connection with a concrete life experience.  They all just sounded like "You're going to be tempted to sin.  Don't sin."  In the same way an English teacher can teach the langauge and not the student, he taught the Bible and not the congregation.  It should be important to note that although Jesus was very familiar with the scriptures (if they were called scriptures back then), he didn't preach chapter and verse!  He taught in parables, parables that were relevant to his audience and that connected to their life experiences. 

2.  Spirit = Good.  Flesh = Bad.

This problem is just huge and, I think, largely the fault of Plato.  Just about everybody who has attended a Southern Baptist Church has heard a the claim that your flesh, which is worldly and evil is in a constant battle with your Spirit, which, if saved, is perfect and good.  First off, this explanation has always made me want to hurl because it just invites the notion that our lives on Earth are meaningless and that all we're really doing is waiting to die so that we can escape these sinful bodies (that God created I might add) and so our perfect spirits can go to heaven. 

Second, how do you decide which desires are "of the flesh" and which ones are "of the spirit?"  If I desire a glass of water, is this evil?  Imagine how this little metaphysical explanation (Spirit = Good, Flesh = Bad) applies to marriage.  My friend Ben, a Southern Baptist preacher, tells me that although other preachers like to say that the biggest problem in marriage is money, the biggest problem in marriage really is physical intimacy.  It's such a big problem that most preachers don't want to talk about it because they're having the same problem themselves.  You just can't go through your entire life thinking that sex is evil because it's "of the flesh" and flesh = evil, and then get married and expect to quit thinking sex is evil. 

I'm certainly not calling for a "deconstruction" of the "duality" of good and evil (note the fancy postmodern terms there).  I still believe in good and evil, but it's just too easy to say that the body is all evil and the spirit is all good, and that somewhere in the midst of those two is what makes you an individual.  Honestly, I think the answer to this delimma is hidden somewhere in "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenence," but I'm not quite sure how to articulate the book's link to Christianity just yet. 
 Posted 7/24/2006 3:06 PM - 43 Views - 12 eProps - 10 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

10 Comments

Visit erbarr's Xanga Site!
I agree especially with #2 and wonder whether this is a wider problem for evangelical strains of the faith. Most problematic, however, if we are centered around the confession of the resurrection of Christ, then the demonization of flesh attacks the very core of our faith. If flesh is bad, then why was the resurrection necessary? If Christ's resurrection is a foretaste of our own, will we not also raise enfleshed?
Posted 7/24/2006 3:58 PM by erbarr - reply

Visit thisonegoesupto11's Xanga Site!
oh man, don't even get me started on how much that neat little false dichotomy of spirit vs. flesh throws a total monkey wrench into your sexuality if you let it. it's not enough that you can't have sex before you're married -- you can't even *want* it, because those are lustful thoughts, and isn't lusting just as sinful as adultery? of course it is! so you're supposed to flee from all those sinful desires, until you get married and those desires magically become good and pure and life-affirming overnight (so to speak). nope, i definitely can't see how that would cause any intimacy problems for good upright baptists.

wow, you really know how to bring out my sarcastic side.
Posted 7/24/2006 11:30 PM by thisonegoesupto11 - reply

Visit thisonegoesupto11's Xanga Site!
or maybe it's baptists that do that.
Posted 7/24/2006 11:31 PM by thisonegoesupto11 - reply

Visit spuerman's Xanga Site!
great post adam. everytime i start to forget about the xanga thing someone pops up with another good "thinking" post. i wonder whether the pastor's sermon's have always been that way, or if it's merely a learned thing. perhaps he was young & ideal like us once too & just got beat down by his job so that now it's all bland. or perhaps he's just the fruit of so many other mediocre pastors that he learned from.

I know every job I've ever had has become tedious after awhile and my performance tends to fall into the path of least resistance unless I'm careful to pay attention to it. Would pastoring be any different? i'd be interested to hear what other pastor's think about both your points. and more importantly, what do we need to do as a society to fix the problem and encourage our pastors? can it come through more training? more education? what keeps us young folk eager and idealistic? is it just hope?
Posted 7/25/2006 8:21 AM by spuerman - reply

Visit StellaZella's Xanga Site!
Provocative topics, hooray! RE: Point No. 1: You're right! the church we currently attend focuses on stories and teaches to themes like love your neighbor, accept other people, etc. You can't go through a service without hearing the word love. My literacy professor keeps telling us that people learn through stories and visual images, ie. parables, and not long lists of unrelated items, ie. the ones your pastor presented. The best part about my church: there is NO little handout with alliterative points for me to write down! In fact, there's no alliteration at all! (I can't tell you how happy this makes me coming from an SBC where every sermon was either a) filled with alliterative points to help us remember or b) focused solely on 2 Timothy 1:5.) My present church also recycles their bulletins!

RE: Point No. 2: I tend to think that moderation is the key. That's probably not biblical, so set me straight if it's not. I see a lot of gluttony in our country. I think it's a mix a result of the mix of our people's selfishness, their isolation, and the current abundance of foodstuffs. I try to have a moderate approach to food and not eat exactly what I want, or try to be happy if things are not exactly the way that I want them all the time. I am extraordinarily selfish so this is a toughy. Still, I don't want to spend my entire earthly life in a box trying to rid myself of sin. How can I appreciate a sunset or love my neighbor from a box? In most cases I try not to get hung up on the sin in my life and try to focus more on living the life God would have me live instead of trying to get into heaven.
Posted 7/25/2006 8:27 AM by StellaZella - reply

Visit loniangel's Xanga Site!

Yup.

Posted 7/25/2006 8:35 AM by loniangel - reply

Visit PYRODaddy's Xanga Site!
Wow...I'm so glad my baptist experience is totally different.  I've been in around half a dozen SBC churches and have never had a preacher state how flesh is evil.  Usually it's Paul saying that it would be great to be in eternal glory with Christ, but that it's also good to be here where we can serve and love.  And I would have to say that most temptations, although they have a physical manisfestation, are actually spiritual in nature.  Isn't that really the danger of sin?  It's not that things like addictions and divorces and nasty diseases come from sin, as some probably do preach, but that sin causes a separation from God.  And as to this preacher you heard...I think a lot of preachers confuse teaching with preaching.  Teaching is the dispensing of knowledge.  Preaching is presenting information and then leading to a personal reaction to it.  Teaching is dying in its most traditional sense.  Lynn Stoddard, the author of Redesigning Education and a former national teacher of the year, said, "We must shift from teh traditional role of knowledge dispenser to that of model, mentor, and organizor of experiences that help people to grow."  I keep that quote up on my wall right next to my desk.  I read it several times a week to remind myself that knowledge without application is pointless.  And that not all surfaces are suitable for dry-erase markers.  And I think that's why I probably will not be accepted as a pastor until our culture shifts even more and the church gets desperate enough to change or die.  Pastors in other cultures come to America expecting to hear these great sermons and instead get teaching from the culture.  Not preaching.  Carpe Deo.
Posted 7/25/2006 11:40 AM by PYRODaddy - reply

Visit StellaZella's Xanga Site!
RYC: Yes! I'll be teaching English II and III here. We start in three weeks and I'm getting really excited about it. A lot of my classmates are brilliant, so I can steal their amazing ideas. One guy is planning on having a short story film festival. I suggested that he go all out and have an awards ceremony and everything with the parents pretending to be the papparazzi and a red carpet. Who knows if that is feasible, but it's fun to dream.
Posted 7/25/2006 5:24 PM by StellaZella - reply

Visit PYRODaddy's Xanga Site!
It's not so much that I've never heard of it...just not in sermons.  There is the struggle between pleasing self and pleasing others.  That is a fleshly struggle, but again, it's not so much about the flesh as it is about the sin.  When you mention sex it is a frustrating topic.  But, again, is sex about solely finding pleasure for yourself?  Or is it an intimate experience that brings two people closer together?  But, to back up your argument, doesn't Romans 10:9-10 says that to commit to Christ takes the flesh and spirit coming to an agreement.  How contradictory is that to what these people are saying.  Sometimes I want to sin for the sprit side...just to be disobedient.  It's early and that probably didn't make any sense. 
Posted 7/27/2006 9:59 AM by PYRODaddy - reply

Visit StellaZella's Xanga Site!
RYC: Yeah, it sucks. We are both devastated, but oh well. I keep trying to tell myself that it's only a thing. Everything else in our lives is just the same as it was before...
Posted 7/30/2006 7:26 PM by StellaZella - reply


Choose Identity
(?)
 
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 
  • Say it with Minis! (?)

Profile Pic:
Default  |  Choose »  (?)



Back to bucketandshovel's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in bucketandshovel's local time zone:
GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)