| | My wife and I went to McAlester OK for the weekend for my mom's 50th b-day party, and then on Sunday, we attended the church where I was a member for about 17 years. Anyways, the preacher preached a sermon and it was just like every sermon I'd heard before. Not bad, just familiar. And as i was listenning to it, I realized that there are (at least) two things wrong with every sermon I'd heard in that church as well as many other Southern Baptist Churches in Oklahoma and Texas:
1. The sermons are not people-centered.
The sermon consisted of a chapter in Ephesians in which the preacher went verse by verse, stopping after each verse to explain what each verse "said," and then moved on to the next verse, etc. Really, he ended up preaching about 9 little sermon vignettes that I don't really remember at all. Why do I not remember anything? Because the theme of each of these little vignettes had no connection with a concrete life experience. They all just sounded like "You're going to be tempted to sin. Don't sin." In the same way an English teacher can teach the langauge and not the student, he taught the Bible and not the congregation. It should be important to note that although Jesus was very familiar with the scriptures (if they were called scriptures back then), he didn't preach chapter and verse! He taught in parables, parables that were relevant to his audience and that connected to their life experiences.
2. Spirit = Good. Flesh = Bad.
This problem is just huge and, I think, largely the fault of Plato. Just about everybody who has attended a Southern Baptist Church has heard a the claim that your flesh, which is worldly and evil is in a constant battle with your Spirit, which, if saved, is perfect and good. First off, this explanation has always made me want to hurl because it just invites the notion that our lives on Earth are meaningless and that all we're really doing is waiting to die so that we can escape these sinful bodies (that God created I might add) and so our perfect spirits can go to heaven.
Second, how do you decide which desires are "of the flesh" and which ones are "of the spirit?" If I desire a glass of water, is this evil? Imagine how this little metaphysical explanation (Spirit = Good, Flesh = Bad) applies to marriage. My friend Ben, a Southern Baptist preacher, tells me that although other preachers like to say that the biggest problem in marriage is money, the biggest problem in marriage really is physical intimacy. It's such a big problem that most preachers don't want to talk about it because they're having the same problem themselves. You just can't go through your entire life thinking that sex is evil because it's "of the flesh" and flesh = evil, and then get married and expect to quit thinking sex is evil.
I'm certainly not calling for a "deconstruction" of the "duality" of good and evil (note the fancy postmodern terms there). I still believe in good and evil, but it's just too easy to say that the body is all evil and the spirit is all good, and that somewhere in the midst of those two is what makes you an individual. Honestly, I think the answer to this delimma is hidden somewhere in "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenence," but I'm not quite sure how to articulate the book's link to Christianity just yet.
|
| | Posted 7/24/2006 3:06 PM - 43 Views - 12 eProps - 10 comments
- recommend
    - recs0
- share
- email
 - sent0
Give eProps or Post a Comment |